After the attacks of Pakistan-funded
terrorists on Pathankot Airbase and then the Indian Army camp in Uri two years
ago, it was necessary for the Modi government to teach a lesson to this
neighboring country. Finally, on 28-29 September, 2016, the Indian Army has a
surgical strike in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. While this bold action of the
army made India feel proud, Pakistan was forced to hide its mouth. In this
successful military operation, nearly three dozen terrorists including many
Pakistani soldiers were killed, while India suffered no harm.
This kind of action across the border is
considered to be very difficult and risky, but a team of Indian Army has done
it successfully. With this action, the message went to Pakistan that if the
need arises, the Indian Army will not hesitate to cross the Laxman Line. Keep
in mind Pakistan has kept several terrorists' hideouts in the occupied Kashmir.
The only purpose of these terrorist bases is to spread instability in Jammu and
Kashmir. India continued to warn Pakistan against these terrorist bases and
continued to expose them on international forums, but neither did they pay
attention to India's concerns nor did the world community.
Due to being a peace loving democracy,
India has never seen aggression towards any neighboring country. Crossing the
border, the surgical strike was a result of the overwhelming majority of
Pakistan who were resorting to terrorism. Earlier, all the governments followed
this policy not to carry military action after crossing the Line of Control.
One of the reasons for this was that they did not want to take the risk of
fighting such an action, but Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister
Rajnath Singh never avoided telling Pakistan that they have to suffer if they do
not stop terrerisom. Under this policy, surgical strikes occurred and every
incident of ceasefire violation is being given a strong response.
Everyone is aware of how some parties
including Congress, had created a hiatus during the surgical strike. Rahul
Gandhi had given this statement against Prime Minister Modi that he was broking
the blood of the soldiers. Some opposition leaders were demanding only for the
evidence of surgical strikes. It is astonishing that in the last week when
various TV channels showed videos of surgical strikes, Congress again came
forward to object objection.
Congress's media in-charge Randeep Singh
Surjewala said on the video of a surgical strike, that the Modi government is
using the bravery and power of the army for their political propoganda. He also
termed it as a shameless attempt of political gains, but when asked if some
parties were demanding its proof, then he could not answer any direct answer.
Some
of other parties also objected to
embarrassment when the videos of surgical strikes came and questioned the
government. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has answered these questions on
behalf of the government. While referring to the statement of blood brokerage,
Congress President Rahul Gandhi not only asked whether there should be no surgical
strike, but also asked whether the only purpose of the Congress is to break the
morale of the army.
The
glorious stories of the army not only bring pride to the common people but also
create the sense of patriotism. Do not know how many families that are ready to
serve the nation by joining the Generation Generation Army. If the general
public is not familiar with the legends of the army, then how will young
soldiers become motivated to serve the country?
Political parties should know that all the
posts in the army are vacant, because the eligible and capable young people are
not coming forward to become a military officer. This situation indicates that
young people are not as motivated to go as far as the army is as inspiring as
they should be. After all, why should anyone object to the details of surgical
strikes or other military feats, and that too when the Army is in favor of
making public its action of surgical strike?
Today it has increased the need for the
promotion of the army's bold campaigns as far as possible. Videos of these
campaigns should also be created, as well as documentary and feature films -
just like the movie on Kargil conflict. Films have been made on almost every
war in our country and some of them are in the classical category. If the Modi
government permitted the video of a surgical strike, then what is wrong in it?
There is no point in Congress saying that
surgical strikes like September, 2016 were done at the time of Manmohan Singh
and earlier in the Vajpayee government. It must have been undoubtedly done, but
making them public also has its value. This government only decides when to
carry out any military action, which is to keep it public? If the Modi
government understood it necessary to make the world aware of the surgical
strike against Pakistan two years ago, then there were some special reasons,
and the biggest reason was to give this tough message to Pakistan that if it
did not respond to anti-India objections Now the Indian army is not going to
sit with his hands on hand. After all, what does it mean to object to this
decision? Every decision of governments is political.
Nationality has always been at the top of
the BJP's agenda and this is why they have a special urgency towards national
anthem and national song. In the same way, he gives priority to the ancient
philosophy and values of India. His leaders keep mentioning mythological
references. The Prime Minister himself usually concludes his address with the
blessings of Bharat Mata. If the Congress and Left parties call them all
Hindus, then BJP calls it Indianism. Even if the Congress and Left parties are
hesitant to proclaim Vande Mataram and Bharat Mata Jai, but the BJP is known to
glorify these symbols of nationalism. If the Congress and the Left are wishing that
the BJP's political vision becomes like them, then it is their unwise thinking.
Comments
Post a Comment